<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Obama Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kerryhowley.com/2009/01/25/the-obama-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kerryhowley.com/2009/01/25/the-obama-effect/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnl</title>
		<link>http://kerryhowley.com/2009/01/25/the-obama-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>johnl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryhowley.com/?p=198#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>Oh that&#039;s terrible. You are not allowed to draw a conclusion that something has changed based on a test statistic being insignificant. Here is what&#039;s happening. In &lt;i&gt;ital&lt;/i&gt; is some rephrasing to make it clearer.

&quot;&quot;&quot;
In total, 472 Americans — 84 blacks and 388 whites — took the exam ... On the initial test last summer, whites on average correctly answered &lt;i&gt;significantly better than&lt;/i&gt; blacks, Dr. Friedman said. But on the tests administered immediately after Mr. Obama’s nomination acceptance speech, &gt;... black performance improved, rendering the white-black gap “statistically nonsignificant” .
&quot;&quot;&quot;

The study uses very few black test takers so gets a lot of error in the estimate of that mean. Note that no claim is made in the NYT that there was a significant improvement in scores for black test takers. Sheesh. Maybe the full article is good, but I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh that&#8217;s terrible. You are not allowed to draw a conclusion that something has changed based on a test statistic being insignificant. Here is what&#8217;s happening. In <i>ital</i> is some rephrasing to make it clearer.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"<br />
In total, 472 Americans — 84 blacks and 388 whites — took the exam &#8230; On the initial test last summer, whites on average correctly answered <i>significantly better than</i> blacks, Dr. Friedman said. But on the tests administered immediately after Mr. Obama’s nomination acceptance speech, &gt;&#8230; black performance improved, rendering the white-black gap “statistically nonsignificant” .<br />
&#8220;&#8221;"</p>
<p>The study uses very few black test takers so gets a lot of error in the estimate of that mean. Note that no claim is made in the NYT that there was a significant improvement in scores for black test takers. Sheesh. Maybe the full article is good, but I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaotician</title>
		<link>http://kerryhowley.com/2009/01/25/the-obama-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>chaotician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryhowley.com/?p=198#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling this &quot;study&quot; is bullshit---there&#039;s nothing white America loves more than an excuse to assuage its guilt, and Obama provides an opportunity for them to do this on a mass scale.

 In this sense he&#039;s more dangerous than Bush every was; so what if the policies of &quot;rendition&quot; (extra-judicial torture) and &quot;the war on terror&quot; (imperialism) continue? &quot;We&quot; (the illusion of democracy) elected a Black man as President; we must be a progressive and enlightened society, very different than how we were a hundred years before!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling this &#8220;study&#8221; is bullshit&#8212;there&#8217;s nothing white America loves more than an excuse to assuage its guilt, and Obama provides an opportunity for them to do this on a mass scale.</p>
<p> In this sense he&#8217;s more dangerous than Bush every was; so what if the policies of &#8220;rendition&#8221; (extra-judicial torture) and &#8220;the war on terror&#8221; (imperialism) continue? &#8220;We&#8221; (the illusion of democracy) elected a Black man as President; we must be a progressive and enlightened society, very different than how we were a hundred years before!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cerebus</title>
		<link>http://kerryhowley.com/2009/01/25/the-obama-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>cerebus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryhowley.com/?p=198#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>Symbolism was always the best thing Obama had going for him from a libertarian standpoint (alongside the paucity of the opposition). But we underestimate how powerful it is. This and something I saw via Obsidian Wings http://hellobeautiful.blackplanet.com/your-man/his-presidents-black are my data points for the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Symbolism was always the best thing Obama had going for him from a libertarian standpoint (alongside the paucity of the opposition). But we underestimate how powerful it is. This and something I saw via Obsidian Wings <a href="http://hellobeautiful.blackplanet.com/your-man/his-presidents-black" rel="nofollow">http://hellobeautiful.blackplanet.com/your-man/his-presidents-black</a> are my data points for the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
